Skip to main content

Gay, transgender persons could be in future census | AP

The Associated Press: Gay, transgender persons could be in future census:
"SAN FRANCISCO — The U.S. Census Bureau is making an unprecedented effort to include same-sex couples in next year's national population count, but counting the number of individuals who identify as gay, lesbian or transgender could be next.

Census representatives told community leaders in San Francisco on Thursday that categories could be added in future editions of the bureau's annual American Community Survey.

They say it was too late to include questions about sexual orientation or gender expression in the 2010 tally.

The survey is designed to give state and local governments a snapshot of how their populations are changing. It is much more detailed than the 10-question census form that will be mailed to every household in March."

2020? That sucks. I guess its better than NEVER. It would mean a LOT to finally get a count. You know who DOESN'T want a count? The Far Right. They KNOW that the number of folks who identify as LGBT is much higher than they report with their skewed studies. Watch their tells. As soon as they start reporting this, they'll try to spin it in some sort of way, of course, but ultimately their stance will be against it. Gays and Lesbians could stand to lose political clout from this if our numbers are small, yet watch LGBT media push this and applaud this.

Why would we push so hard for this?

We all know that LGBT people make up a significant portion of the US population. Deep down, we're all aware.

LGBT people are confident. We're interacting with folks in our community all the time, meeting hundreds and thousands of gay people, meeting married but out bisexuals, meeting closeted folk who are trying to reach out. We are well aware of our numbers.

The Far Right is aware of our numbers too. They see our turnouts, they confront us directly often--they know we're a big group. They want to downplay our numbers because it helps them promote their Hate Agenda, but they know. Hell, there are MANY on the Far Right who WON'T be marking 'homosexual' on their 2020 Census forms that probably should!

Watch and see, though. However they spin it, they're going to be against it, because they know they're on the wrong side of history.

What do you think their excuses will be? Exposure of homosexual questions to children? Special Rights? Religious Persecution? What do YOU think they'll use to explain why they don't want us counted?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michigan: Announcement of Calvin College board's stand on homosexuality, same-sex marriage expected soon

Big news out of Michigan, surely the Professors (who tend to be very progressive) can't wait to find out - MLive.com : "Calvin College professors will find out Monday whether the college’s governing board will withdraw a controversial memo ordering them to follow Christian Reformed Church teachings against homosexuality and same-sex marriage. President Gaylen Byker will update faculty on board discussions that took place over the weekend by the Board of Trustees, including a decision on the memo, spokesman Phil de Haan said Saturday."

In anti-gay attack, AIM falsely asserts "pedophile" Jennings was "teaching 14-year-old boys" about sexual practices | Media Matters for America

In anti-gay attack, AIM falsely asserts "pedophile" Jennings was "teaching 14-year-old boys" about sexual practices | Media Matters for America : "In attacking the media for allegedly insufficient coverage of Obama administration official Kevin Jennings, a blogger for Accuracy in Media, which purports to 'set the record straight on important issues that have received slanted coverage' -- and which has a record of antagonism toward gays -- smeared Jennings as a 'pedophile' and falsely claimed that '[v]ideos have surfaced of Jennings teaching 14-year-old boys the dangerous sexual practice of 'fisting,' and discussing with them the particulars of oral sex.' In fact, Jennings did not conduct that seminar and, in fact, reportedly criticized it when he became aware of its content." AIM is a crock. They're nothing more than Republican mouthpieces.

NEW BILERICO GUEST POST: What the GLAAD Network Report Means

MY NEWEST CONTRIBUTION TO BILERICO; PLEASE VISIT BILERICO.COM FOR THE ENTIRE POST! Yesterday, GLAAD released its Network Responsibility Index report for 2009, ranking the top broadcast and cable networks on their LGBT inclusivity in programming. ABC led the broadcast networks this year with depictions like Ugly Betty 's gay Ken-doll Marc, played by Michael Urie, among other depictions on other shows. HBO led the cable networks with shows like gay-created True Blood , No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency , and Big Love ; with over 42% of programming being LGBT inclusive. We're not surprised that there were so many cable networks that ranked high on the index; #2 Showtime's programming consisted of 24% LGBT-inclusive programming, #3 TNT dedicated 19% of its hours to LGBT-inclusive content, #4 MTV 17% (really, only 17?), and #5 Lifetime—the in-denial fourth gay network—had 14%. This was all while the Network's rankings topped out at ABC's 24% and went down from there to C