Skip to main content


This Ameriqueer guest column is by Ed Anderson of Royal Oak, MI about the pick of Sonia Sotomayor to replace moderate/liberal Justice Souter. We will be hearing a lot more about Sotomayor on Ameriqueer as her confirmation looms and we learn more of her views.

Fair or Unfair
By Ed Anderson

"A wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion" Sonia Sotomayor said in 2001, What does this say about a woman who wants to be on the Supreme Court of the United States? Will she be sensitive to all citizens or will she only find empathy with people, cases that she feels are moral?

There are no clear indications on how Sotomayor will vote on LGBT issues because there are no rulings in her career involving gay rights cases. However the Human Rights Campaign says “We are encouraged by several of Judge Sotomayor’s decisions which have recognized the Constitutional right to privacy, first articulated in Griswold v Connecticut where the Supreme Court first ruled on privacy, which lays the foundation for fundamental rights for LGBT people. We look forward to conducting a thorough examination of her record on privacy issues.” She did co-sign a letter to the editors of The Daily Princetonian on February 27, 1976 criticizing an anti-gay attack at Princeton. While encouraging, this is not nearly enough to determine what she would do if given the chance to interpret the law in the highest court of the land.

While a comment Sotomayor made, may seem to have been racially insensitive, the opposite may actually be true. Her position on gay issues may be unclear but she stuck up for gay men over thirty years ago and there is nothing to suggest that she wouldn’t do that again.


Popular posts from this blog

Chris Geidner: In Iowa, judges are ousted.

Via Chris Geidner's Poliglot blog at Metro Weekly:


In Iowa, which declared Iowa's marriage ban unconstitutional under the state's constitution in 2009, the National Organization for Marriage got one of its first electoral victories this year. The judicial retention elections appear to have resulted in the replacement of all three justices up for a vote this year.

Here, as of 3:35 a.m. and with 1767 out of 1774 precincts reporting, are the Iowa Secretary of State's election results:

Supreme Court Justice David L. Baker
Yes 443437 45.75%
No 525865 54.25%

Supreme Court Justice Michael J. Streit
Yes 442459 45.6%
No 527921 54.4%

Supreme Court Chief Justice Marsha Ternus
Yes 437118 44.99%
No 534486 55.01%

The court was unanimous in its 2009 ruling that Iowa's constitution required marriage equality."


-HEY #p2! (Progressives).

We can't do this alone.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans have been fighting for over half a Century to have basic Civil Rights. We have so much to do, and we are such a small group. Without an army of Progressive allies, we can't win. Our rights as American citizens are constantly being compromised, despite life-time service to our nation as good, contributing citizens. We can't wait any longer. We need our Progressive allies to step up and go to bat for us TODAY.

We must demand Progressives have got to make LGBT rights a top priority in 2010, or we will keep being put on the back-burner.

There will ALWAYS be something more important than LGBT equality affecting America--issues like Health Care Reform and the Economy effect LGBT people too! However, when we are discriminated against under the law every single day, we can't give our all to fixing these problems. We are long overdue to be counted as equal citizens. That&#…

WHAT. THE. HELL? NEW HAMPSHIRE??? (and a prop 8 update)

Okay, first let me just say CALIFORNIA can breathe easy for a few more days as San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsome convinced the Supreme Court to hold of on releasing their decision on Prop 8 a few more days until the 30th anniversary of the White Night Riots is passed.  We're probably going to see it Tuesday, the following Thursday or THAT following Monday.  
NOW:  WHAT THE HELL, NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSE?!?!?!?!???!?!?!?!????!
The NEW HAMPSHIRE House, which on May 6 APPROVED Marriage Equality by a vote of 178-167, has now stalled the REWRITTEN BY GOVERNOR JOHN LYNCH bill 188-186--That's right, folks, two votes.  25 members did not vote at all, and opponents of the bill failed to kill it in a 173-202 vote, but this STILL means we're waiting on NEW HAMPSHIRE to GET ITS SHIT TOGETHER!  The House passed a resolution to continue negotiating with the Senate by a vote of 207-168.  If that same number votes for the 're-re-renegotiated' bill in the next two weeks it will pass, but …