Skip to main content

The death of parties.


Its sad, but its inevitable. Eventually every party has to end. It may end earlier than everyone wants, or it may just go on and on for far too long--but regardless, the music is cut and the lights have to be turned out at some point.

Since 1980, we've seen America grow increasingly more partisan, and the Democrats and Republicans distinguish themselves from one another with greater vitriol every year. Yet, studies show the middle is growing as well. A majority of Americans consider themselves "moderates," and the number grows constantly. Americans are generally very complex in their beliefs, making it hard to pin any single American to a specific party: you've got the pro-environment, anti-gay, pro-health care rural father, married to his pro-environment, pro-gay, anti-healthcare wife; you've got the pro-life gays and the anti-tax gays, you've got anti-tax, anti-health care, pro-choice people... each American's politics is as unique as their fingerprints.

So why do we still have blanket, straight-party support of these divisive organizations?

The gay community is getting a majorly rude awakening. Despite throwing millions of dollars, and thousands of volunteer hours at the Democratic Party in 2008, the Democratic party has sent us a nice little pre-printed thank you card, wadded up our cash, stuffed it in their pockets, and promptly forgot about us.

Recently polls have shown that Jewish Americans are starting to feel like they've been had as well--though not quite as bad as the gays.

Health Care advocates are reeling that the democratic leaders in congress are refusing to consider a single-payer option, and are steaming mad at the concessions on health-care reform that the same leaders have sold them out to make.

It happens after every election. You throw your support behind a party who promises you the world, and then as soon as they have their majority and settle comfortably into their jobs, the work ends.

If you're sick of being played by your party, maybe its time to leave your party. Send them back their DNC membership materials, their DCCC surveys, the RNC invitations and say "thanks, but no thanks," and DON'T give this year.

What will happen to the parties if people stop giving to them? Well, not much. These juggernauts will continue running. However, you can create some positive change locally--take your money that you were going to give to the National or State party, and find candidates that you really believe in and give to them. The more local, the more satisfied you'll be. Candidates running for President, U.S. Senator or Governor rarely fulfill their promises. But your State Representative candidates are the perfect people to throw your support behind--they have a WHOLE HELL of a lot less people to please, they can truly stick to their guns and maintain their integrity. And if they don't? No money the next year!

You have power, and that power goes beyond the ballot box--your real power is your wallet. Pick those candidates that truly deserve your support and max out your donations to them. Volunteer for them, and help groom and build a new generation of politicians that break the mold--that don't just rubber-stamp whatever the party tells them to, but truly set their own agenda and stick to it.

Drop parties and support candidates, and you'll see real change sooner than later!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In anti-gay attack, AIM falsely asserts "pedophile" Jennings was "teaching 14-year-old boys" about sexual practices | Media Matters for America

In anti-gay attack, AIM falsely asserts "pedophile" Jennings was "teaching 14-year-old boys" about sexual practices | Media Matters for America : "In attacking the media for allegedly insufficient coverage of Obama administration official Kevin Jennings, a blogger for Accuracy in Media, which purports to 'set the record straight on important issues that have received slanted coverage' -- and which has a record of antagonism toward gays -- smeared Jennings as a 'pedophile' and falsely claimed that '[v]ideos have surfaced of Jennings teaching 14-year-old boys the dangerous sexual practice of 'fisting,' and discussing with them the particulars of oral sex.' In fact, Jennings did not conduct that seminar and, in fact, reportedly criticized it when he became aware of its content." AIM is a crock. They're nothing more than Republican mouthpieces.

Michigan: Announcement of Calvin College board's stand on homosexuality, same-sex marriage expected soon

Big news out of Michigan, surely the Professors (who tend to be very progressive) can't wait to find out - MLive.com : "Calvin College professors will find out Monday whether the college’s governing board will withdraw a controversial memo ordering them to follow Christian Reformed Church teachings against homosexuality and same-sex marriage. President Gaylen Byker will update faculty on board discussions that took place over the weekend by the Board of Trustees, including a decision on the memo, spokesman Phil de Haan said Saturday."

NEW BILERICO GUEST POST: What the GLAAD Network Report Means

MY NEWEST CONTRIBUTION TO BILERICO; PLEASE VISIT BILERICO.COM FOR THE ENTIRE POST! Yesterday, GLAAD released its Network Responsibility Index report for 2009, ranking the top broadcast and cable networks on their LGBT inclusivity in programming. ABC led the broadcast networks this year with depictions like Ugly Betty 's gay Ken-doll Marc, played by Michael Urie, among other depictions on other shows. HBO led the cable networks with shows like gay-created True Blood , No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency , and Big Love ; with over 42% of programming being LGBT inclusive. We're not surprised that there were so many cable networks that ranked high on the index; #2 Showtime's programming consisted of 24% LGBT-inclusive programming, #3 TNT dedicated 19% of its hours to LGBT-inclusive content, #4 MTV 17% (really, only 17?), and #5 Lifetime—the in-denial fourth gay network—had 14%. This was all while the Network's rankings topped out at ABC's 24% and went down from there to C