Skip to main content

LC--On 50 We ask: What's in Breckenridge, CO?

Crossposted at

Check out this week’s Lundon Calling with Ace Lundon and featuring Phil Reese and… oh yeah Lance ditched us this week–but it was still a fun! We answered fun questions like what’s in Breckenridge CO? Did you get your flu shot? Do you use honey, vinegar and cinnamon?

Ace updated us on his friend Jeramie Rain-Dreyfuss and Ace’s trip to Las Vegas. Is the death penalty akin to putting down a rabid dog? I gave Ace an election roundup and we talked about marriage. Ace told us about the importance of getting to know people.

We talked about death, sharing of yourself and living in truth and honesty. Ever listen to Sting? Ace used to work at his favorite West Hollywood hangout, and brought him his bagels! That was after his time as Editor at the old Advocate competitor, the Coast-to-Coast times. Speaking of the Advocate, we discussed the Advocate folding… into an insert in Out magazine.

Want to know what to do to make changes in your world around you? We’re going to teach you how you can How can you help PFLAG, and how to stay young.

My question is about Marriage. Do you agree with Ace? Is Marriage dead? Are we wrong to focus on Marriage? Is marriage bad or great or something in between? Answer in the comments! Find out more in EPISODE FIFTY OF LUNDON-CALLING!


Sean said…
We are absolutely right to focus on Marriage. It is the central defining issue that stands b/w us and full equality.

And it has to be the "M" word too. Creating parallel institutions (DP's, Civil Unions) is not only an unacceptable alternative, but it creates the sort of "Marriage Lite" that actually contributes to declining Marriage rates.

I want the same 1016(ish) civil rights automatically granted to anyone (inmates, drunks, morons, republicans) just for getting married. Why should it be denied to me?
Ameriqueer said…
I definitely agree that Marriage Equality is vital. On the show, Ace was arguing against fighting for Marriage Equality for several reasons. I disagree. However, I do agree that we ought to be fighting harder to get ENDA passed now. If I get married, it will do me no good if I can get fired and kicked out of my home because of it.

I think we need to throw our energies into passing ENDA and overturning DADT--and then we should move immediately into overtuning DOMA and passing UAFA (bi-national couples) and the DPBO act (Unified federal tax code for LGBT couples). After that, we get the Supreme Court to overturn the patchwork of gay marriage bans and make Marriage Equality the benchmark everywhere.

NOT that we can only do one thing at once. We ought to be taking our states to court now to set the stage. We ought to be lobbying our lawmakers now on DOMA, UAFA and DPBO now. However, our BIG PUSH needs to be ENDA and DADT because those two are sitting in Congress, waiting to be passed, and with enough positive pressure WILL pass.

We must, then, recruit allies to help us in the fight. 4 people talking to a Senator about ENDA is nice, but how about 20 people? If we get a massive showing of straight allies on Capitol Hill and in district offices showing up on OUR behalf, they can't deny that this is the right thing to do!

Popular posts from this blog

Chris Geidner: In Iowa, judges are ousted.

Via Chris Geidner's Poliglot blog at Metro Weekly:


In Iowa, which declared Iowa's marriage ban unconstitutional under the state's constitution in 2009, the National Organization for Marriage got one of its first electoral victories this year. The judicial retention elections appear to have resulted in the replacement of all three justices up for a vote this year.

Here, as of 3:35 a.m. and with 1767 out of 1774 precincts reporting, are the Iowa Secretary of State's election results:

Supreme Court Justice David L. Baker
Yes 443437 45.75%
No 525865 54.25%

Supreme Court Justice Michael J. Streit
Yes 442459 45.6%
No 527921 54.4%

Supreme Court Chief Justice Marsha Ternus
Yes 437118 44.99%
No 534486 55.01%

The court was unanimous in its 2009 ruling that Iowa's constitution required marriage equality."


-HEY #p2! (Progressives).

We can't do this alone.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans have been fighting for over half a Century to have basic Civil Rights. We have so much to do, and we are such a small group. Without an army of Progressive allies, we can't win. Our rights as American citizens are constantly being compromised, despite life-time service to our nation as good, contributing citizens. We can't wait any longer. We need our Progressive allies to step up and go to bat for us TODAY.

We must demand Progressives have got to make LGBT rights a top priority in 2010, or we will keep being put on the back-burner.

There will ALWAYS be something more important than LGBT equality affecting America--issues like Health Care Reform and the Economy effect LGBT people too! However, when we are discriminated against under the law every single day, we can't give our all to fixing these problems. We are long overdue to be counted as equal citizens. That&#…

WHAT. THE. HELL? NEW HAMPSHIRE??? (and a prop 8 update)

Okay, first let me just say CALIFORNIA can breathe easy for a few more days as San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsome convinced the Supreme Court to hold of on releasing their decision on Prop 8 a few more days until the 30th anniversary of the White Night Riots is passed.  We're probably going to see it Tuesday, the following Thursday or THAT following Monday.  
NOW:  WHAT THE HELL, NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSE?!?!?!?!???!?!?!?!????!
The NEW HAMPSHIRE House, which on May 6 APPROVED Marriage Equality by a vote of 178-167, has now stalled the REWRITTEN BY GOVERNOR JOHN LYNCH bill 188-186--That's right, folks, two votes.  25 members did not vote at all, and opponents of the bill failed to kill it in a 173-202 vote, but this STILL means we're waiting on NEW HAMPSHIRE to GET ITS SHIT TOGETHER!  The House passed a resolution to continue negotiating with the Senate by a vote of 207-168.  If that same number votes for the 're-re-renegotiated' bill in the next two weeks it will pass, but …