Skip to main content

LC--On 50 We ask: What's in Breckenridge, CO?

Crossposted at Lundon-Calling.net

Check out this week’s Lundon Calling with Ace Lundon and featuring Phil Reese and… oh yeah Lance ditched us this week–but it was still a fun! We answered fun questions like what’s in Breckenridge CO? Did you get your flu shot? Do you use honey, vinegar and cinnamon?

Ace updated us on his friend Jeramie Rain-Dreyfuss and Ace’s trip to Las Vegas. Is the death penalty akin to putting down a rabid dog? I gave Ace an election roundup and we talked about marriage. Ace told us about the importance of getting to know people.

We talked about death, sharing of yourself and living in truth and honesty. Ever listen to Sting? Ace used to work at his favorite West Hollywood hangout, and brought him his bagels! That was after his time as Editor at the old Advocate competitor, the Coast-to-Coast times. Speaking of the Advocate, we discussed the Advocate folding… into an insert in Out magazine.

Want to know what to do to make changes in your world around you? We’re going to teach you how you can How can you help PFLAG, and how to stay young.

My question is about Marriage. Do you agree with Ace? Is Marriage dead? Are we wrong to focus on Marriage? Is marriage bad or great or something in between? Answer in the comments! Find out more in EPISODE FIFTY OF LUNDON-CALLING!

Comments

Sean said…
We are absolutely right to focus on Marriage. It is the central defining issue that stands b/w us and full equality.

And it has to be the "M" word too. Creating parallel institutions (DP's, Civil Unions) is not only an unacceptable alternative, but it creates the sort of "Marriage Lite" that actually contributes to declining Marriage rates.

I want the same 1016(ish) civil rights automatically granted to anyone (inmates, drunks, morons, republicans) just for getting married. Why should it be denied to me?
Ameriqueer said…
I definitely agree that Marriage Equality is vital. On the show, Ace was arguing against fighting for Marriage Equality for several reasons. I disagree. However, I do agree that we ought to be fighting harder to get ENDA passed now. If I get married, it will do me no good if I can get fired and kicked out of my home because of it.

I think we need to throw our energies into passing ENDA and overturning DADT--and then we should move immediately into overtuning DOMA and passing UAFA (bi-national couples) and the DPBO act (Unified federal tax code for LGBT couples). After that, we get the Supreme Court to overturn the patchwork of gay marriage bans and make Marriage Equality the benchmark everywhere.

NOT that we can only do one thing at once. We ought to be taking our states to court now to set the stage. We ought to be lobbying our lawmakers now on DOMA, UAFA and DPBO now. However, our BIG PUSH needs to be ENDA and DADT because those two are sitting in Congress, waiting to be passed, and with enough positive pressure WILL pass.

We must, then, recruit allies to help us in the fight. 4 people talking to a Senator about ENDA is nice, but how about 20 people? If we get a massive showing of straight allies on Capitol Hill and in district offices showing up on OUR behalf, they can't deny that this is the right thing to do!

Popular posts from this blog

Michigan: Announcement of Calvin College board's stand on homosexuality, same-sex marriage expected soon

Big news out of Michigan, surely the Professors (who tend to be very progressive) can't wait to find out - MLive.com : "Calvin College professors will find out Monday whether the college’s governing board will withdraw a controversial memo ordering them to follow Christian Reformed Church teachings against homosexuality and same-sex marriage. President Gaylen Byker will update faculty on board discussions that took place over the weekend by the Board of Trustees, including a decision on the memo, spokesman Phil de Haan said Saturday."

In anti-gay attack, AIM falsely asserts "pedophile" Jennings was "teaching 14-year-old boys" about sexual practices | Media Matters for America

In anti-gay attack, AIM falsely asserts "pedophile" Jennings was "teaching 14-year-old boys" about sexual practices | Media Matters for America : "In attacking the media for allegedly insufficient coverage of Obama administration official Kevin Jennings, a blogger for Accuracy in Media, which purports to 'set the record straight on important issues that have received slanted coverage' -- and which has a record of antagonism toward gays -- smeared Jennings as a 'pedophile' and falsely claimed that '[v]ideos have surfaced of Jennings teaching 14-year-old boys the dangerous sexual practice of 'fisting,' and discussing with them the particulars of oral sex.' In fact, Jennings did not conduct that seminar and, in fact, reportedly criticized it when he became aware of its content." AIM is a crock. They're nothing more than Republican mouthpieces.

NEW BILERICO GUEST POST: What the GLAAD Network Report Means

MY NEWEST CONTRIBUTION TO BILERICO; PLEASE VISIT BILERICO.COM FOR THE ENTIRE POST! Yesterday, GLAAD released its Network Responsibility Index report for 2009, ranking the top broadcast and cable networks on their LGBT inclusivity in programming. ABC led the broadcast networks this year with depictions like Ugly Betty 's gay Ken-doll Marc, played by Michael Urie, among other depictions on other shows. HBO led the cable networks with shows like gay-created True Blood , No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency , and Big Love ; with over 42% of programming being LGBT inclusive. We're not surprised that there were so many cable networks that ranked high on the index; #2 Showtime's programming consisted of 24% LGBT-inclusive programming, #3 TNT dedicated 19% of its hours to LGBT-inclusive content, #4 MTV 17% (really, only 17?), and #5 Lifetime—the in-denial fourth gay network—had 14%. This was all while the Network's rankings topped out at ABC's 24% and went down from there to C...