Skip to main content

The president's idea of being a fierce advocate: Let them on the lawn to find chocolate eggs, then tell them to get the 'ef out of here!

UPDATE: Pam from Pam's House Blend finds a gem in the brief: The administration compares same-sex marriages to incest or adults marrying children!


Dan Savage: "Barack Obama’s record on gay rights so far: disturbing, unsound, false, discriminatory, damaging, nonsensical. Before today you could argue that the Obama administration was too busy with the economy and the war and health care to focus on making good on his campaign promises to gays and lesbians, that Obama simply didn’t have the time to take up our issues. But you can’t make that argument anymore. The Obama administration has the time to take up gay rights issues—but only, it seems, to do harm. I can’t take my vote back. And I’m not sure I would if I could. But I sure as hell would like to have my money back."

So... about a week ago, Obama's administration filed a brief with the Supreme Court in support of Don't Ask Don't Tell, however, the Court refused to hear the case, and that was that.

NOW, the Obama administration has filed a brief in support of the Defense of Marriage Act. You know, that DOMA that Obama campaigned on trying to get overturned? That one. Read this bullshit.

So when Obama campaigned for the LGBT vote and in the early days after the election claimed he would be a FIERCE advocate for LGBT people, what he meant was, "I'll allow them on the lawn for Easter Eggs." Because that's what we've got from him on his campaign promises.

Now, the State Department--part of his administration, mind you--is doing MUCH better for LGBT people... in the state department... and abroad. The State Department is offering Domestic Partnership benefits now, and is going to do more to combat LGBT abuses abroad. However, we're still seeing NONE of the campaign promises fulfilled.

So now, in 2012, when the President tells you he's going to fight for your rights again in his SECOND term, tell him: "I want more than eggs, Mr. President."


Popular posts from this blog

Chris Geidner: In Iowa, judges are ousted.

Via Chris Geidner's Poliglot blog at Metro Weekly:


In Iowa, which declared Iowa's marriage ban unconstitutional under the state's constitution in 2009, the National Organization for Marriage got one of its first electoral victories this year. The judicial retention elections appear to have resulted in the replacement of all three justices up for a vote this year.

Here, as of 3:35 a.m. and with 1767 out of 1774 precincts reporting, are the Iowa Secretary of State's election results:

Supreme Court Justice David L. Baker
Yes 443437 45.75%
No 525865 54.25%

Supreme Court Justice Michael J. Streit
Yes 442459 45.6%
No 527921 54.4%

Supreme Court Chief Justice Marsha Ternus
Yes 437118 44.99%
No 534486 55.01%

The court was unanimous in its 2009 ruling that Iowa's constitution required marriage equality."

Can we trust Rasmussen anymore?

WHAT. THE. HELL? NEW HAMPSHIRE??? (and a prop 8 update)

Okay, first let me just say CALIFORNIA can breathe easy for a few more days as San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsome convinced the Supreme Court to hold of on releasing their decision on Prop 8 a few more days until the 30th anniversary of the White Night Riots is passed.  We're probably going to see it Tuesday, the following Thursday or THAT following Monday.  
NOW:  WHAT THE HELL, NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSE?!?!?!?!???!?!?!?!????!
The NEW HAMPSHIRE House, which on May 6 APPROVED Marriage Equality by a vote of 178-167, has now stalled the REWRITTEN BY GOVERNOR JOHN LYNCH bill 188-186--That's right, folks, two votes.  25 members did not vote at all, and opponents of the bill failed to kill it in a 173-202 vote, but this STILL means we're waiting on NEW HAMPSHIRE to GET ITS SHIT TOGETHER!  The House passed a resolution to continue negotiating with the Senate by a vote of 207-168.  If that same number votes for the 're-re-renegotiated' bill in the next two weeks it will pass, but …