Skip to main content

My News-Journal Letter to the Editor on DADT Repeal

Shortly after the Senate DADT hearings in early February, I contacted my Senator, Kay Bailey Hutchison to urge her support for repeal.

My letter to the editor in today's Longview News-Journal has Hutchison's response to me and my comments on her position:

Sunday, March 7: Supports repeal of Don't Ask policy


I recently wrote a letter to U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison urging her to help repeal the military's ban on gay men and lesbians openly serving in the military — the so-called Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy.

I hoped that as a member of the Senate's Armed Services Committee, and someone with a reputation as a fair-minded legislator, Hutchison would be open to studying a repeal of the policy. To my surprise, Hutchison responded that she flatly opposes a repeal because "the Department of Defense has testified before Congress that the current policy has served the military well."

Apparently, Hutchison is unaware that Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen have testified before her committee that the time has come to end the military's discrimination against gay and lesbian service members. Former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairmen Gen. Colin Powell and Gen. John Shalikashvili have also called for ending the ban.

Furthermore, Gen. Ray Odierno, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq has voiced his support for a repeal. Even Vice President Dick Cheney, a former Secretary of Defense, has indicated he believes gay men and lesbians should be allowed to serve openly and honestly in the military.

I agree with Admiral Mullen that repealing this discriminatory policy is a simple matter of integrity and fairness. Gay and lesbian Americans have served in the military throughout our nation's history. They have fought and died, and continue to die, for the freedoms we enjoy in this country today.

If even the uniformed and civilian leadership at the Pentagon support repealing the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, why can't the senior senator from Texas do the same?

- Patrick Franklin, Longview


Note: I have reinserted paragraph breaks which the newspaper, for some reason, did not.


Popular posts from this blog

Chris Geidner: In Iowa, judges are ousted.

Via Chris Geidner's Poliglot blog at Metro Weekly:


In Iowa, which declared Iowa's marriage ban unconstitutional under the state's constitution in 2009, the National Organization for Marriage got one of its first electoral victories this year. The judicial retention elections appear to have resulted in the replacement of all three justices up for a vote this year.

Here, as of 3:35 a.m. and with 1767 out of 1774 precincts reporting, are the Iowa Secretary of State's election results:

Supreme Court Justice David L. Baker
Yes 443437 45.75%
No 525865 54.25%

Supreme Court Justice Michael J. Streit
Yes 442459 45.6%
No 527921 54.4%

Supreme Court Chief Justice Marsha Ternus
Yes 437118 44.99%
No 534486 55.01%

The court was unanimous in its 2009 ruling that Iowa's constitution required marriage equality."

Can we trust Rasmussen anymore?

WHAT. THE. HELL? NEW HAMPSHIRE??? (and a prop 8 update)

Okay, first let me just say CALIFORNIA can breathe easy for a few more days as San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsome convinced the Supreme Court to hold of on releasing their decision on Prop 8 a few more days until the 30th anniversary of the White Night Riots is passed.  We're probably going to see it Tuesday, the following Thursday or THAT following Monday.  
NOW:  WHAT THE HELL, NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSE?!?!?!?!???!?!?!?!????!
The NEW HAMPSHIRE House, which on May 6 APPROVED Marriage Equality by a vote of 178-167, has now stalled the REWRITTEN BY GOVERNOR JOHN LYNCH bill 188-186--That's right, folks, two votes.  25 members did not vote at all, and opponents of the bill failed to kill it in a 173-202 vote, but this STILL means we're waiting on NEW HAMPSHIRE to GET ITS SHIT TOGETHER!  The House passed a resolution to continue negotiating with the Senate by a vote of 207-168.  If that same number votes for the 're-re-renegotiated' bill in the next two weeks it will pass, but …